Subject: Windsor Soup
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:59 -0000

Dear Mr Google
I am the founder of the Society for the Preservation of Organic Old
Foods.
SPOOF. We try to encourage the eating of good nourishing foods rather than
the factory produced mass meals of today.
The internet is ideal for spreading our message and the garnering of good
recipes via search engines including you own is invaluable.
One of the recipes SPOOF encourages is a soup named after the Royal town
of
Windsor. Indeed the soup was served to the guests of Queen Victoria. It is
not widely known however because it is untrue that a diplomatic incident
occurred at the Castle when Brown Windsor Soup was actually served to the
French ambassador without horseradish dumplings!
Now our society is not best pleased by Google.
For several months typing " Windsor Soup" into Google and hitting " I feel
lucky" took the searcher to www.windsorsoup.co.uk where the recipe was
available with a recipe for the dumplings.
Now the poor public is taken to a commercial called foodnetwork.com where
a
celebrity chef no-one has heard of gives the recipe.
Three points.
1 Emril Largasse is obviously French and therefore cannot be trusted to
cook
Brown Windsor Soup.
2.He suggests the use of sirloin steak. This is grossly extravagant. Diced
stewing steak is quite adequate.
3. Nowhere does he give the recipe for the dumplings despite the
diplomatic
incident.
I therefore suggest that you revert to your former position and put
www.windsorsoup.co.uk back to number one so that when people hit " I feel
lucky" they can be again
Yours
Arthur Brownwindsor
Society for the Preservation of Old Organic Foods
Windsor
Berks

Hi Arthur,

Thank you for taking the time to write. We are sorry that you have been
unhappy with your search results.

As you may know, results in our index change regularly based on ongoing,
automated processes aimed at improving the quality and content of our
search results. It is certainly our intent to represent the content of the
Internet fairly and accurately. The ongoing changes you have observed are
part of this effort.

Inclusion and ranking in Google's search results is free. A site's ranking
in Google's search results is determined by computer algorithms that use a
number of factors to calculate the relevance of that page. Google does not
manipulate search results by hand or accept payment to change results
ordering. We do not manually assign keywords to any site. We believe
strongly in allowing the "democracy of the web" to determine the position
of sites in our search results. For more information on how Google ranks
pages, please see our "Why Use Google" page at
http://www.google.com/technology/index.html.

If this response did not adequately resolve your question, we hope that
you will visit the webmaster section of our site at
http://www.google.com/webmasters/ . In an effort to better address your
needs, we've dedicated this entire section of our website to answering
common webmaster questions, providing website design and content
guidelines, listing Google's quality requirements and recommendations, and
much more.

Of course, we cannot anticipate and answer everyone's questions on our
website. Realizing this, we have also created a Google discussion group on
Google Groups where Google users and webmasters can connect to share their
vast knowledge and experience. You can access this group at
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=google.public.support.general. If you
have already checked the webmaster section of our website and haven't
found an answer, we encourage you to post your question to the Google
Support group.

Regards,